| [Alb-Net home] | [AMCC] | [KCC] | [other mailing lists] |
List: Prishtina-E[Prishtina-E] Layers of Problems in Kosova, by Alice Meadkosova at jps.net kosova at jps.netThu Apr 11 02:43:25 EDT 2002
Layers of Problems in Kosova How to Solve Them? Start at the Bottom and Work Up By Alice Mead Special to Zeri, Prishtine, 04/02/02 During its entire history, this has never happened: the people of Kosova have never had the inviolable right to a government by the will of the people and, now that they have suffered a long-term genocide, this issue deserves extra careful consideration--not less consideration. With internationals on the scene, an extra layer of expectations has been added to an already layered situation, so that there are multiple layers of needs, none of them well-defined, objectively discussed, or planned for. The resulting obscurity and mess is blamed on the Albanian population only probably because they are at the moment the least represented at high levels, the least enfranchised of all the groups involved. What are some of the layers? The Supranational Level: Kosova is now a struggle in post-cold war alliances of Nato vs Russia, US vs Russia, Democracy vs Communism, and EU vs Balkan region, Partnership for Peace vs locally funded military groups. The future of Kosova is discussed informally on many occasions, in many places, about which the people have no knowledge or power. The Historical Level: Boundary problems -- dating from 1912/1913 the lack of resolution about the boundaries of Albania leads to perpetual modern-day accusations of Greater Albanianism from Slavs and Europeans as a reason to keep self-determination from Kosova's citizens. Corrections for this historical wrong should be made in other, constructive ways. The International Definition of Sovereignty: The continued conflict at the UN and EU level about the rights of sovereign nations, which used to, and still do have the right to commit genocide or mass murder of certain populations within their own borders without compromising the principle of sovereignty. In other words, the right to expel a people by force or to mass murder them is legal, the right to secede by representative vote following genocide is not. This is an astounding definition of statehood, one which sanctions destroying the inviolable rights of its citizens. One that led implicitly to the situation now. Top levels of international governments disregard the recommendations of scholars and research groups regarding a final status for Kosova. The Legal level: Lack of peace treaties, lack of justice -- Kosova is without redress or justice or reparations for the 50 years or 10 years of 2 years of wrongs it suffered under FRY rule. The lack of a peace treaty following the 1999 war or a "Dayton Conference" to organize and settle the layers of issues is a major contributor to the lack of success of UNMIK to rule as a protectorate with the full confidence of the people that it represents their best interests. Internationals stubbornly fail to understand their role in the confusion. The Local Nationalist Level: Ethnic aspirations are seen as a struggle for liberation -- unacknowledged by internationals who claim to be free of nationalism. The Albanian dream to be free of Slav rule has not been acknowledged nor has the historic pattern of Slav domination and hegemony been acknowledged. General Pavkovic remains in power. Karadzic goes free. While we all pretend that the former Yugoslavia exists. The UNMIK Level: The undefined, a democratic UN protectorate that rules Kosova without representation and expects an instant, imposed multiethnicity that is now predefined as already a failure based on the development of enclaves in Kosova (do we have a Chinatown in every large American city? a Harlem? A Spanish Harlem? We even had slavery, genocide of native peoples, but never mind) and the crimes of passion that took place against Serbs during the first 3 months following the war. This was wrong. The murderers should be punished. The population should not be held collectively guilty. But tomorrow is not a new day in Kosova; according to EU and UN, and the future will be predetermined by this undefined past. This is the basis being used to determine Kosova's final status? That reverse ethnic cleansing precludes self-determination? Wouldn't the logical conclusion be, then, to withdraw self-determination from Serbia and make it a UN protectorate? The Human Level: Here is the weakest link -- a lack of empowerment and representation of those whom these issues are being "fought" over. There is the problem from the top down. To truly solve it, start at the bottom and work up. Empower the least powerful to create just solutions. To repress this confusion, to ignore it, not address it, blaming those without power for it, is to set the stage for smoldering violence that becomes intractable -- like Palestine or Northern Ireland. We created those realities and we are in the process of creating this one by our own lack of principles. The Bush regime has made known that it is clearly not interested in the Balkans -- so, while US attention wanes, quick and cheap solutions that do not meet even the simplest criteria for equality, transparency, or justice, are hurried through in cobbled-together inventions, like the High Group, or in embassy meeting rooms in Belgrade and Prishtina in the hopes that the people will be none the wiser. - Alice Mead is an American writer and human rights activist. All rights reserved. Republication or redissemination of this article are expressly prohibited without the written consent of Zeri, Prishtine.
More information about the Prishtina-E mailing list |