| [Alb-Net home] | [AMCC] | [KCC] | [other mailing lists] |
List: ALBSA-Info[ALBSA-Info] Milosevic's money trailAgron Alibali aalibali at yahoo.comTue Feb 13 23:06:43 EST 2001
The Times (London) February 13, 2001, Tuesday The Milosevic money trail John Reynolds John Reynolds on the task of tracing a dictator's assets THE lot of a City litigator can involve many innovative causes of action but litigating a claim based on genocide is one of the more unusual. Last year a group of Kosovan Albanians now in the US brought an action against the former Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic and other key figures. The claim, filed in the US Federal Court in the District of Massachusetts, alleges that senior Yugoslav officials engaged in crimes of genocide, war crimes and other violations of international humanitarian law in Kosovo through an organised conspiracy to achieve an ethnically pure Serbia. The service of the proceedings on Milosevic was unusual. At first attempt, the papers were returned marked "Not known at this address". The truth was "This address not known" - the dictator's former home - was now a crater, having been destroyed in a cruise missile attack. An additional factor is that Milosevic remains in Serbia and retains a certain position. Indeed, in November he was re-elected leader of the Serbian Socialist Party. It is typical for litigation against a head of state to take place once the individual concerned is out of power. There are a number of reasons for this. First, it is only once the individual has left office that there is likely to be the political will or individual motivation to bring an action. Secondly, after a change of regime, former supporters are more inclined to share information and evidence. And finally, if the individual has left his home country as well as office, he will need access to money, making assets easier to identify and freeze. Milosevic was President when the clients brought their action; in October he was ousted. Meanwhile, Augusto Pinochet faces the prospect of criminal and civil action in Chile - previously regarded as a safe haven. The security that each of these former leaders derives from his home country is significant. In the case of Pinochet, there is still strong popular support, which may yet influence the criminal investigation. For Milosevic, the future is uncertain. While he may be leader of the party, that may not be enough to ensure protection either in the short or the long term (particularly in light of December's election results). He is subject to an international arrest warrant and the political pressure from outside the country to hand him over to the UN authorities is stronger now that he is no longer head of state. While it may go against the norm to be bringing proceedings against a former head of state who retains certain power in his home country, the circumstances of Milosevic do not add undue complexity to this case in the way that Pinochet's presence and status in Chile may affect investigations there. The current proceedings are not in Milosevic's home country and, once judgment is obtained, it is unlikely that enforcement would be sought there. Likewise, assets likely to be of interest to the claimants are not in Yugoslavia. Despite the unusual aspects of this case, the post-judgment legal arguments and weaponry which may be deployed are little different from those in many commercial asset-tracing exercises; in fact, the notoriety of the defendant may make some aspects easier. The major task is usually identifying assets. The investigation techniques will be the same as those in any commercial case; in this case the task is made easier because the identity and whereabouts of many of Milosevic's assets are known to Western authorities. Also, while in many commercial asset-tracing cases the authorities in the offshore jurisdictions take a neutral stance, this position may change if the assets are shown to be those of an indicted war criminal. In any case, the tracing and enforcement procedures and case law in most of the offshore jurisdictions are well developed and possible counter-arguments can be addressed. The author is head of litigation at McDermott, Will & Emery. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
More information about the ALBSA-Info mailing list |