| [Alb-Net home] | [AMCC] | [KCC] | [other mailing lists] |
List: ALBSA-Info[ALBSA-Info] Yugoslav Crisis- from JRLGazhebo at aol.com Gazhebo at aol.comSat Sep 30 09:36:00 EDT 2000
The following article was published at Johnson's Russia List. Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 From: "Dmitri Glinski Vassiliev" <dmitri_glinski at mtu-net.ru> Subject: Yugoslav Crisis Dear David: It appears that enough time has passed to draw some conclusions on the Russian government response to the latest Yugoslav crisis. Russia may be the only external force which has had the credentials required to help Yugoslavia avoid its descent into another civil war. Russia was given this opportunity by being one of the few governments whose observers were allowed in the Yugoslav elections. With this, Russia could have seized the long-delayed chance to change the tragic history of that country for the better with impeccably legitimate means. Russian observers should have provided their evidence on the election results (together with other observers), and if it showed the first-round victory for Dr. Vojislav Kostunica (as I think it would), Russia should have extended him immediate recognition as the new Yugoslav President. The absence of a clear Russian position, or at least some clear enunciation of the criteria which would guide the Kremlin's position in this crisis is as deplorable as it is a fairly predictable foreign policy extension of our domestic developments. Insofar as our government has any sustained foreign policy beyond its relations with the G-7 and the IMF, in Yugoslavia they have been clinging to the last nomenklatura regime of Eastern Europe, in the ugliest stage of its decay. Both Western expansionists and their strategic partners in Moscow badly needed this little monster in the middle of Europe - the former to justify their interventionism, the latter for the sake of their politically and financially lucrative position as occasional mediators. Meanwhile, the Yugoslavs withstood two mutually reinforcing agitprop machines - the one of their own government and another one operated by those in the West for whom another foreign civil war could be a vehicle to advance their own agendas. In these impossible circumstances, the Yugoslavs gave only 5% to their local brand of Zhirinovsky. These results attest to the endurance of the nation's common sense and rationality in spite of all the destruction and brainwashing, and this alone would be enough to make Yugoslavia, if military confrontation is avoided, the moral superpower of Europe. Although many things are uncertain at this moment, it seems that Kostunica represents the current of democratic nationalism in the traditional, developmental sense of this word. This rising trend has substantial support in many countries, where there is growing discontent both with local nomenklaturas that have privatized the public sphere and with intrusive globalism of the end-of-history enthusiasts. It is too early to judge his specific policies, but if he succeeds to avoid a violent confrontation with Milosevic (which he clearly cannot win), he will have far-reaching opportunities for influence well beyond the borders of his country. Dmitri Glinski Vassiliev IMEMO RAS
More information about the ALBSA-Info mailing list |