From mentor at alb-net.com Mon Dec 22 23:20:32 2003 From: mentor at alb-net.com (Albanians-Today News and Information) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 23:20:32 -0500 (EST) Subject: [Albanians-Today] MJAFT! action for better education in Albania Message-ID: The text below has been sent to the Albanian Parliament by the MJAFT! Movement. (MJAFT = ENOUGH). ---- forwarded e-mail ---- >From "MJAFT subscribe list" Dear Friend, Please find attached the latest information update from the MJAFT! Movement.(English is below the Albanian version.) If you need further information please do not hesitate in contacting us. info at mjaft.org 04 222 389 www.mjaft.org -------------------------------------------------------------- MJAFT! Movement, Network of secondary and elementary education NPO-s, (ROA) and the Institute of Public and Private Finances have recently joined their forces aiming at the increase of public expenditures on education through advocacy and lobbying. We believe that if education is thoroughly a priority for our government than this should be reflected in the public expenditures. Below you can find two documents that give a broader view of the existing problem and our incentive of action. The first is a letter addressed to the Members of Albanian Parliament and the second one is our material presentation submitted in front of Parliamentary Commission of Economy. During this week, MJAFT, ROA and IPPF will organize different activities as TV Shows, meetings with MP-s, and protests. Honourable Members of Albanian Parliament, We, the Network of secondary and elementary education NPO-s, (ROA) the Institute of Public and Private Finances and MJAFT Movement, strongly agree that a nation.s future is created among the school desks and the level of a society.s emancipation is measured and evaluated by the attention and care that it manifests toward citizens education. The impression that Albanian education is decent can be considered an enormous misconception. Foreign as well as Albanian experts claim that the actual situation of education does not generate the needed professional capacities to bring the Albanian economy up to speed. In addition they point out that the actual level of education is below international standards and thus cannot compare to the levels of democratic development in western countries. We jeopardize deterioration in European coexistence if we do not strive to develop European citizenship. Complete reform is a necessity for the education system as a whole. A fundamental precondition for the success of this reform is: More expenditure. During the last ten years, governmental contribution toward education has been around 3% of GDP. The world average on education expenditures is around 5% of GDP. EU countries spend on the average 5% of their GDP, and at the same time persist for a substantial increase in expenditures in order to lead the EU on a path toward a more competitive economy. On average, countries with medium income, among which Albania is counted, allocate 4.8% of their GDP. The average of European countries in transition is slightly higher. (For the year 2000: Byelorussia 6.0%, Czech Republic 4.3%, Estonia 4.4%, Hungary 7.6%, Latvia 4.8%, Lithuania 6.3%, Slovakia 4.7%, Slovenia 4.4%, and Ukraine 4.0%). Comparing country percentages of GDP allocated to Education, Albania is ranked in 93rd in the world. With the actual level of progress that Middle Term Expenditures Framework provides, Albania will achieve the present-day educational level of Macedonia in 57 years. In the National Strategy for Socio-Economic Development (NSSED) it has been promised to increase the percentage to 3.7%. Education is proclaimed to be a priority. However, until now it obviously has not been taken into account during budget negotiations. An increase, at least to 3.7% of GDP allocated toward education, as promised in NSSED, would testify that politicians are proving their beliefs that the education system exemplifies our responsibilities toward the future generations. Along this path, Albania will accelerate close the gap with other countries in region similar to us, even in their aspirations. We are committed to increase governmental and public interest for the quality of education. We truly believe that we will find allies within Parliament and hope for a positive reply within next week, 15-20 December. Sincerely, Human Development Indicators of Human Development (combination of three basic components): . A long and healthy life; . The level of education; . A decent standard of living. The Problem Education indicators . In 1989 the average amount of education was 11.6 years, while in the year 2000, it had decreased to 8.5 years, which means an average decrease of 3 years in education over a decade!!! . Level of attendance in schools has decreased in pre-elementary school as well as high-school. The numbers show a high dropout rate, respectively 37 per cent and 36 per cent (compared to 1990) . In sub-urban areas school attendance is below average. It is recognized that access to education as well as the quality of education in these areas is problematic Why high level of drop-outs??? The reasons for the high level of drop-outs are diverse for different levels of education. . In pre-elementary education, drop-out is related to the closing of public institutions. . Related to obligatory education, decrease in attendance is mainly caused by 2 factors: . 35 per cent of students that drop-out from school do so due to economic reasons . Meanwhile, almost one of fifth of them drop-out from school because of the poor level and the low quality of education Other problems . The number of schools has decreased with 55 per cent . Their closing has its effect on poor families by bringing a decrease in the level of their education . Urban population growth, large number of teachers without relevant related education - especially in remote areas - are other factors that cause a decrease in the number of the students attending high school . 12-per cent of the population over 15 years old is unable to read and to write, thus is classified as .illiterate.. . The level of illiteracy in urban areas (7 per cent) and the rural areas (19 per cent) is disproportional. . 83,5 % of poverty is found among individuals without education (4.1%) or ones with elementary education (79.4%) (taken from INSTAT) . The Public Education Service suffers from quality problems related to: . Educational tools and instruments; . An increase in the no. of teacher.s without relevant related education; . Serious deficiencies in teacher.s vocational trainings concern outdated or ingrained teaching methods; . Content problems, etc. . The quality of education is lower in urban areas, remote areas and sub-urban areas. The Causes . During the last ten years, public funds for education remain around 10 per cent of budget expenses, but their reflection in the GDP has been decreasing. . From 3, 8 per cent in 1995, this indicator has decreased to 2, 8 percent in 2002, which is much lower than the level of other Eastern European Countries. Commitments of the Albanian Government Millennium Development Goals The Albanian Response "or what YOU have committed" . Goal 3: Ensure that, by the year 2015, children everywhere, boys and girls alike, will be able to complete a full course of primary schooling. Taken from Albania and Millennium Development Goals, pg.17 Millennium Development Goals The Albanian Response "or what YOU have committed" Increase the level of attendance in elementary education - From 90 percent in the year 2000 to 94 percent in the year 2004 and 100 percent in the year 2015, divided in accordance with groups of population and areas. Increase the level of attendance in secondary education - From 40 percent in the year 2000 to 50 percent in the year 2004 Increase the average of years of education - From 8.5 years in 2000 to 10 years in 2004. UN Recommendations on Millennium Development Goals . Possibilities should be created to increase financing for the educational sector at all levels and in all regions. Thus, an increase of the share of budget expenditures for education (as a percentage of the GDP) should be considered as one of the primary goals that the government should strive for. THE PRIORITIES OF NATIONAL STRATEGY for SOCIO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (NSSED) "or what YOU have promised" Priority fields of public demands are: . Health and Education . Infrastructure . Improvement of governance . Economical growth . Social Support . Macroeconomic stability Goals and Objectives from NSSED "or what YOU have promised" The disturbing and acute problems present in the educational system call for direct reforms within this sector. The main goals to strengthen this process of reforms, as well as the objectives of the education strategy are: . Increase participation of population within education services, focusing on poorest level of society and remote country areas; . Improve quality of services and rebuilding and adapting the education system in accordance with market developments and needs; The education sector.s specific objectives within the strategy for economic growth and poverty reduction are: . Increase participation in elementary education focusing on poorest level of society and remote country areas as well as increasing participation in secondary education, especially professional education . Improve the quality of teaching methods . Expand professional education and adapt it better to market needs. . Increase administration efficiency and education system financial efficiency The Strategy translated into funds The major problems of poverty in rural and remote areas of the country are the poor quality of essential services as well as health and education services, requiring more sources which need to be addressed in order to solve these problems. This leads to a decrease in sources available for solving problems of other problematic areas regarding development. Strategic Priorities in MTEF Strategic priorities for public expenditures under 2004-06 MTEF, remain largely unchanged and reflect the policy and program proposals identified in NSSED These are: . To increase the share of GDP allocated to health and education which is very low in comparison to international standards and reflects the poor quality of public services in these sectors; A Comparison to other countries in the world The budget for education as percentage of the GDP . 1st place Moldova 10.3% . 24th place Congo, 5.9% . 39th place Macedonia, 4.9% . 92nd place Sri Lanka 2.9% . 93rd place Albania 2.8% . 94th place Benin 2.7% . 95th place Ethiopia 2.7% . 96th place Antigua and Barbuda 2.6% . 97th place Mozambique 2.6% . 98th place Nicaragua 2.6% . 99th place Bhutan 2.4% . 100th place Uganda 2.4% . Average 4.75 % Strategic Priorities under MTEF "or what YOU have promised on June 2003" According to NSSED, strategic priorities of public expenditures which are sustained by financial sources are: . Increase resources, both in real terms and as a share of the GDP, which are allocated to health and education sectors; Linking MTEF and NSSED . Budget program and resource ceiling for 2004 are based on the priority measures identified under the NSSED. . Linking and settling of the correct ratios between the NSSED, MTEF 2004-06 and the draft Budget 2004 is considered as a process and principal goal of this framework. Linking MTEF and NSSED . MTEF assures all the needed mechanisms through which the main priority objectives, identified under the NSSED, can be integrated in to the budget process Strategic settlement of Priorities . Strategic prioritization of public expenditures is beginning to be achieved through the MTEF process. The NSSED has highlighted the strategic requirements for a relative redistribution of resources toward health and education sectors which address the relatively low levels of spending within these sectors. NSSED Priorities Priority fields of public demands will be: . Health and Education . Infrastructure . Governance improvement . Economical growth . Social Support . Macroeconomic stability In the meantime!?! NSSED Promises that: . Human Development: Education: The percentage of the GDP allocated to education will be increased from 3.4 in 2002 to 3.7 of GDP in 2004 MTEF Promises that: . Education expenditures are envisioned to increase from 3.0% of GDP in 2004 to 3.1% of GDP in 2006. A Comparison to other countries in the world With the above mentioned level of progress of 0.1% in 3 years, Albania will achieve the current level of education of: . Macedonia in 57 years . Congo in 87 years . Moldova in 219 years Budget 2004 . Education expenditures are projected to be 3.1% of the GDP What WE ask for? . Recognition of the promises made regarding the increase of the percentage for education of the 2004 budget from 3.1% in 3.7% of GDP